insomniac17 on 24 August 2008
| zexen_lowe said: First, I don't think Age II can be topped, but if they make it, it should NOT go past the Imperial Age, AoEIII was bad because of the timeline it dealt with, AgeIV should cover either the first's or the second's, or even a combination of both timelines, but not go past it. Second, they should totally forget what they did in AgeIII, review the mechanics of AgeII and see how can they improve them, but not complicate the game needlessly. The card bonuses, the evolving homebase should not come back. Really, the best way they can make a great AgeIV is to make a perfected AgeII |
This. I loved AoE II, filled up my harddrive with all sorts of saves on campaigns, random matches, and maps that I made. The game took up so much of my time. AoE III, well, I expected it to be much more like AoE II and AoM. I rarely play it, and really would love to see them bring it back to how they had it in these two games.
