Riachu said:
Shadowblind said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Riachu said:
Shadowblind said:
I know scores really don't matter...but there are more people out there who look at a final score then read the review. Raichu is right; by how they scored it it should be getting an 8.8-9.0
Well whatever. All I know is I'm getting it and hope that it does very well sales wise. I'm just worried that low scores effect sales sometimes...
|
8.2 is not a low score. In fact, 8.2 is actually a fairly high score. Sales wise, well, it depends if Namco-Bandai actually use commercials for the game this time
|
I think he meant that when casuals see a game and see 8.2, the think, "Meh, I like to buy 9s."
We're talking about a very specific group here. The ones smart enough to look up reviews, but who don't know enough about the industry to acutally know about the "Tales of" series, or pretty much any jrpgs.
They're the ones who know the big headlines only, but couldn't tell you who Jaffe was, or if Mike Capps hates the Wii or not.
That group might have a small portion that would turn away from an 8.2, but to an internet smart, that visits this site, I'd imagine that the 8.2 would make their mind up in the other direction, and could actually gain the game a few sales.
|
Thats what I'm afraid of. Internet savvy people are far in the minority, and tales loving 360 owning smart internet users are in the far minority ;) Score was actaully the reason I didn't get Lost Odyssey a while back.
|
Ever played Mass Effect? That game was rated by reviewers as AAA and I personally didn't like it that much
|
Well it deserved those high scores though =p. But it is hard to compare to a JRPG.
