DYACK WATCH: He speaks the truth but incorrectly applies it.

[steven787]

Sqrl said:

If we "don't get it" maybe he should explain "it" to us.

Of course I think most people "get it" and by that I mean they "get" that when someone tells you that you just don't "get it" they are just being an elitist snob too wrapped up in their own view of themselves to admit "it"s not as good as they've convinced themselves "it" is.

Hopefully he gets over "it" and tries again, from what I've seen of Too Human its not a complete miss, "it"s just got poor execution in some key areas. Perhaps a little more listening to his play-testers instead of telling them they don't "get it" and "it" could have been good...who knows?

There are games that get better scores on graphics alone.  This game looks pretty good, it has to be pretty flawed or misunderstood.

To me there are plenty of games on Metacritic who have been rated higher and lower, which didn't deserve those scores.

I am eager to play this for several different reasons.  Reviews numbers mean very little to me.

 

Reviewers love to play the same shit over and over, check off features on a list.  They like to compare the responsiveness of hitting button "a" and when they can't compare apples to apples they get upset.