By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mudface said:
twesterm said:
Mudface said:
And you also cant forget the reason PC is going to be in a distant last place for a long time is because it's complicated. If I have a 360 I can play any 360 game. If I have a PS3 I can play any PS3 games. If I have a Wii I can play any Wii game. If I have a PC I cannot play any PC game.


You can if you buy a $175 graphics card every 3-4 years. The money you'd save on the cheaper games would more than pay for it as well.

 

Try actually reading the post next time, or at least read all of it.  Here, I'll show you the part you skipped and even highlight the important part.

I'm not talking about cost, that's another beast, I'm just talking about the fact I have a PC and I have to know something about my PC to know if I can play that game.  The hardcore gamer that buys the $2000+ PC knows this stuff, most people don't or know they don't and don't want to go through the trouble of upgrading.

OK, no need to get snippy. I'm just wondering why you consider the PC to be in 'a distant last place' given this report.

 

 

Because compared to what consoles sell it is in a distant last place?