By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
megaman79 said:
MrBubbles said:
megaman79 said:
mr bubbles, again with the hard news stories? and one sided patriotism too

 

i feel sorry for you that you would prefer an article trying to glorify the Taliban killing french soldiers.

 

Associated Press should have plenty of news regarding Iraqi wives prostituting themselves because all their men have been killed or kidnapped. What about mass migration of families into neighbouring countries. What about the hopeless economy in Afghanistan where farmers get so desperate Heroin is the only crop they can grow. Otherwise their families starve to death and at some point some get desperate.

How about entire cities and villages flattened with millions of bombs, homes like yours, with families inside that have no relation or sympathy what so ever towards the few people who committed 9/11.

Im sorry but your selection of news is not providing context to any of this.

 

The Taliban is a gang of rapists and murderers; they support al Qaeda.  al Qaeda and the Taliban would not allow you to play video games.

I'm not talking about multidimensional behaviors of nations like the U.S., Russia, France, the U.K., Iraq under Saddam or Malaki, or many other legitimate governments that have an array of good and bad traits.  Those 2 groups are a threat to your way of life.  I have written paper after paper discussing insurgencies and terrorism.

It is very sad that the French have suffered this loss.  I am also very sad that so many young Muslim men are exploited by these groups to support this form of organized crime, slaughter, and rape.  I feel even worse for the hundreds of thousands of people who were killed or maimed, and the millions who have been oppressed under the thumb of al Qaeda or the Taliban.

Iraqi insurgents refuse to work with al Qaeda because of their brutality and oppression.

No person or government is perfect, but just because France, the U.S., or the West have committed wrongs doesn't make the opposing party good.

 



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.