I think Too Human will be WAY better then Haze. Although I agree that this game is comparable with Haze in the sence that 1) The track-record of the developer is great. And 2) The first hands-ons seemed to be promising and later on they would kind-of suck...
Why Too Human will be better then Haze?!... Haze is just a generic shooter which is really behind it's time. Too Human is being bashed by loads of people that have yet to play the game because of it's 'different' control-scheme (note: the two analog stick fighting-controls). Also, people complain about the graphics... Which I think is B.S because the game seems to look fine to me!... And I don't hear people complain about games from EA all the time (Army of Two, Fifa, Need For Speed... They all don't look as good as they could on the systems). I'm using EA as an example now, but I mean the 'rest' of the 3rd-party developers, ofcourse.
Overall: Dennis Dyack and Silicon Knights are known as perfectionists and real innovators in the industry. Only popping out a game once every ~4-5 years and making it really 'different' then other offerings at that time. I think people just aren't used to the new things Silicon Knights is introducing with Too Human. Some might not like it, some just might! That's why you get the mixed-feelings from people who've played the demo and the mixed reviews all across the board. Reviewers are just people who have an opinion on something (some game) which doesn't necessarly correspond with the rest of the audience.
So: Too Human is going to be good (or not) according to what you expect of it and how you like the things Silicon Knights introduces. The basics of these 'things' seem to be not badly incorporated into the game, so it comes down to taste!
I recon, although the game might receive mixed reviews, it will eventually get some kind of cult-status.
EDIT: And sell quite decent... Although not astounding!
THE NETHERLANDS
