| ssj12 said: http://gamepolitics.com/?s=Jack+Attack first 4 links. Read what GamePolitic's responses to Jackass Thompson |
Funny you should mention that.
My man tried REPEATEDLY to get him to address Jack's claims in an interview with the guys from GamePolitics.com but they kept refusing. We were always gonna let the other side defend themselves but the guy from there didn't even wanna do that. We weren't gonna let Jack talk with those kinds of words without being fair and letting the accused party have their say.
Here's the last line in that JT story.
"Editor's Note:
In the interest of fairness, while interviewing Attorney Jack Thompson several statements were made toward GamePolitics.com political editor Dennis McCauley. Attempts to contact Mr. McCauley were initially successful, and from this an interview regarding Mr. Thompson's allegations towards GamePolitics.com was agreed upon and sent to Mr. McCauley. Upon receiving our questions, Mr. McCauley declined to continue with the interview."
http://www.popzart.com/index.php?page=view&topic=851&side=3
My man, Mr. Universal, doesn't understand why he refused to address Jack's claims. Popzart definitely made every attempt to be even-handed in all this and let every side speak their piece. Nobody was pitting anybody against anybody. It was simply a matter of fairness. Why let someone run you down without giving you a chance to speak your side?
John Lucas
Words from the Official VGChartz Idiot
WE ARE THE NATION...OF DOMINATION!
