LOL MATURE said:
http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/928391.asp http://vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=6978®ion=All http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/943273.asp?q=ninja%20gaiden http://vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=7709®ion=All huh?
|
Oh please, you're telling me that an average of nearly ALL gaming review sites is fair, no matter how biased they are towards a system?
Let's see:
Ninja Gaiden - Heavily marked down for not being a big leap from no.1 and somewhat cheap AI, despite most reviewers saying it has the best combat engine in the genre.
VS
Heavenly Sword - Marked down for being way too short (6-8 hours) and given marks up for being the only decent game PS3 saw for a while AND being a new IP.
Play both and come back and tell me that Heavenly Sword is as good as Ninja Gaiden II. Also, sales figures? pointless, one was released 3 months ago and the other a year ago. Also note one is now platinum which is $50 AU VS $119 RRP for the other ($79 if you bargain shop).
Also, I notice you didn't make any comparisons with Lair, then why bold it?
@axumblade who wrote:
What about Ninja Gaiden 2? Lost Odyssey? Blue Dragon? Kameo? Tenchu Z? Ninety-Nine Nights?
How is Ninja Gaiden a flop, 83% average on Granks (which I don't trust by the way), and 660,000 copies in 3 months. LO and BD did their job by allowing MS to break into Japan. Kameo, is up for debate, but I don't recall HS and Lair levels of hype for that game. Tenchu Z and 99 Nights? Zero hype for both of those games, that's like you listing "carnival games" if that were a list of Wii games.
Did people forget the words "High Profile" releases?







