By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close


Exactly Monti

Epic is doing what most game companies should be doing. Evaluating their sales, and seeing what sells on systems before promising support for a console.

Evaluating their sales? They can't base what sells on the Wii based on their own sales. And if you mean games like Epic's, there has to actually BE games like Epic's on the Wii to see if they sell.

That's what Ubisoft did. They promised quality games, before finding out that shovelware sells pretty damn well. So they reformatted what they were doing. So instead of Epic promising something and falling through, you know exactly what to expect.

More bullshit. Ubisoft is making better games than that. They just are waiting to show them off, as they did with Red Steel 2. So what if they are making cheap games. That didn't magically start with the Wii, and Ubisoft is not giving the Wii nothing but that. The fact that you support that lie, even after I realized it was a lie (but you are denying I did, no matter how many times I stated I did), just makes you look like a fanboy.

I like that.

No, you like developers supporting your Wii bashing, however subtle you try to make it. Supporting lies with no actual proof is fanboyism. And that's to both you and Montana. You both are full of it. Epic has no proof their games won't sell on the Wii, and you know it. Sovelware selling well is ONLY proof of those games selling well. It is NOT MAGICALLY PROOF OTHER GAMES WILL FLOP.

 

 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs