By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
rocketpig said:
Sqrl said:
okr said:
Sqrl said:

You'll notice I did bold that part.  The distinction doesn't change the inflamatory nature of the post.  I'll also point out that the post violates forum rule 4-2.  If you have something to add please do, but explain your position instead of just cheerleading.

1) I was what?? "Cheerleading"? Only because I agreed with stof?? And my answer was inflammatory but yours were not? Wow...

2) And, by the way, I already contributed to this thread that I think the "news" posted at the beginning are completely redundant and were only aimed to start yet another controversial political discussion.

1) Your first sentence in the post only served to declare that several posters were wrong and you failed to back it up, this is a violation of the forum rules. Period.  The end.

2) I realize you are proud of this, but this violate rules 4-4.

"No posts specifically to to say that a poster or the thread sucks, either with words or pictures." 

Now, I haven't even given you a warning yet but if you'd like to continue we can change that.  All I asked you to do was support your position with an argument or don't post.  You can agree with (and disagree with) whoever you like so long as you actually support it.

You suck. 

Anyway, so have we reached a conclusion yet? Should I press the big red button or not?

 

 

From you thats a compliment

And yes you should press the red button...after all you don't want to live with the regret of never knowing what it does =P



To Each Man, Responsibility