okr said:
1) I was what?? "Cheerleading"? Only because I agreed with stof?? And my answer was inflammatory but yours were not? Wow... 2) And, by the way, I already contributed to this thread that I think the "news" posted at the beginning are completely redundant and were only aimed to start yet another controversial political discussion. |
1) Your first sentence in the post only served to declare that several posters were wrong and you failed to back it up, this is a violation of the forum rules. Period. The end.
2) I realize you are proud of this, but this violate rules 4-4.
"No posts specifically to to say that a poster or the thread sucks, either with words or pictures."
Now, I haven't even given you a warning yet but if you'd like to continue we can change that. All I asked you to do was support your position with an argument or don't post. You can agree with (and disagree with) whoever you like so long as you actually support it.








