Sqrl said:
You'll notice I did bold that part. The distinction doesn't change the inflamatory nature of the post. I'll also point out that the post violates forum rule 4-2. If you have something to add please do, but explain your position instead of just cheerleading. |
I was what?? "Cheerleading"? Only because I agreed with stof?? And my answer was inflammatory but yours were not? Wow...
And, by the way, I already contributed to this thread that I think the "news" posted at the beginning are completely redundant and were only aimed to start yet another controversial political discussion.








