Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
Obliterator1700 said:
Soriku said:
If FF XIII went multi...why can't FF V XIII (which is a spin-off no matter how anyone spins it. It looks cooler than FF XIII though. Agito also looks better than FF XIII O_o) go either especially since FF XIII on the 360 will likely sell over a million? That's just money not gained.
But who really cares NOW...FF Versus is a long while so if people want a PS3 they'll decide beforehand...but not because of Versus.
Also...why would Agito matter that much? That's another FF XIII spin-off...on the PSP (which is cheap). This wouldn't be a "problem" just for 360 owners...PS3 owners too. I'm sure there are PS3 owners without a PSP.
Also, it's not going to JUST be 1/3 :P They're making 6 FF XIII games. 1 is FF XIII, 1 is Versus, 1 is Agito, 1 is Haeresis which they trademarked and is rumored for the Wii, and 2 unknown but I think we should also expect another 360 one (maybe), and a DS one. Though I COULD see Versus being exclusive (don't know why they'd do this though) and a 360 one exclusive as well. But my point is it's not going to be just for PS3 and 360 owners to choose from...it's going to be for A LOT of owners. |
I guess spin offs are made for no reason then? Huh?
|
wat. I don n't understand what you're trying to say.
|
That in bold...
|
OK. I still don't understand your point.
|
Your trying to say if FFXIII went multiplatform why cant versus? Your trying to imply that spin offs dont matter at allor as much as the orginal...
|
That's true though. Spin-offs don't matter as much as the main games. In Versus's case, it's likely going to have the same budget as FF XIII and the only reason they made FF XIIO multiplatform is so they can get more MONEY. When Versus and FF XIII are similar, there's no reason to keep Versus exclusive when there's more money to be made on the PS3 and 360 than the PS3 alone.
|
There's no reason to keep an game exlusive unless a company pays you too...
