By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kwaad said:
Crono said:

That right there proves you have no idea what you're talking about, and that I can safely ignore everything else you said. The PS2 might have been 75% of a gamecube, and the Wii is easily twice a gamecube, making PS2 37.5% of a Wii.

The power gap is greater than you realize. This will become evident in the coming months. Shovelware never pushes the hardware boundaries.


Yes. So the PS2 is ~37.5% of a Wii, while the PS3 is 16x faster than the PS2, so that makes the the Wii 25% the speed of a PS3, so the Wii is closer to the PS2. Thank you for your criticisim. You showed me, that I didnt explain it well enough.

EDIT: If I translate your numbers, into my logic, I'm still right for what I say, and that means I have a better idea of what I'm saying than you, it would probibally be in your best intrest to not ignore me! 

The PS2 might be closer to the Wii than the Wii is the PS3, but as you've illustrated (25% vs 37%) it isn't by much.  All I was saying is the gap in hardware power between PS2 and Wii is similar to the gap in power between Wii and PS3.

This logic also firmly places wii into the next hardware generation, much to the chagrin of all the "wii isn't next gen" naysayers.

It also backs up my theory that the PS3 and the Xbox 360 actually belong either in arcades or in the 8th gen of hardware.  They have way too much power way too soon and far to high a cost.

 



Witty signature here...

Wii: 14 million by January  I sold myself short

360: 13 million by January I sold microsoft short, but not as bad as Nintendo.

PS3: 6 million by January. If it approaches 8 mil i'll eat crow  Mnn Crow is yummy.

With these results, I've determined that I suck at long term predictions, and will not long term predict anything ever again. Thus spaketh Crono.