So many Sequels? Does anyone esle not want new games

[Onyxmeth]

senortaco said:
@ xman: Yeah I'm like you in a way, I've always been a PC gamer, but it was my kids that got me into console gaming last gen. I guess you can say I'm in the Causal Gamer crowd. I just wanna play a game to relax could care less what system. =/

@ Onyxmeth: I'm sorry sir no slant in the slightest. It was asked what systems had the most exclusive new IP's, from a poster, so I was curious as well. The PSN, as well as the XBLA, and WiiWare games...as I stated in this thread...I consider all new IP's. ...If you want to look at it in "some" way, it supports is that there are more NEW ip's then previously though.

@ noslodecoy: Good list, kinda goes back to what I just mentioned above, that their is more newer IP's then previously thought, just not alot of "Blockbusters" that gamers seem to want.

I know. Like I said, I didn't want to be all accusatory so I left it open that this could have been nothing more than an oversight. What you did however was unintentionally slant things in favor of the Wii.

1. Multiplats are more prone to being bounced between the PS3 and 360, so by not including them, you take more from them than you will the Wii.

2. Using future titles bodes well for the Wii in the case of third parties because of a late development start by them in comparison to the 360 and PS3.

3. Not counting downloadable titles because they are all original(which isn't true by the way) goes in favor of the Wii because their DL service, WiiWare just started in April, and it's library can't compete yet with either the PS3 or the 360.

Just look at the other list made, which doesn't show unreleased titles, does show multiplats and does show DL titles, and look at how different the slant becomes, heavy in favor of the 360.