appolose said:
To be fair, Clinton did have the Internet economic boom, whereas Bush has the oil price and houseing market collapse, none of the three necessarily have much influence from the president. And are invasions and occupations inheritently bad? And how well can he play the sax? |
Clinton's tax hike and job creation helped the economy, whereas Bush's tax cuts and denial of the housing bubble helped the collapse.
ALL UNILATERAL INVASIONS ARE BAD.
Especially during tax cuts. That combination destroys the economy.
Clinton on the sax: it starts at 1:30: