By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
appolose said:
The Ghost of RubangB said:
Clinton.


Better economy.
Fuller employment.
Highest incomes for African-Americans.
Better foreign policy.
Better image of America around the world.
No invasions.
No occupations.
No tax cuts for the rich.
And less vacation time wasting my taxdollars.
And he can read and play saxophone.

 

To be fair, Clinton did have the Internet economic boom, whereas Bush has the oil price and houseing market collapse, none of the three necessarily have much influence from the president.  And are invasions and occupations inheritently bad?  And how well can he play the sax?

 

Clinton's tax hike and job creation helped the economy, whereas Bush's tax cuts and denial of the housing bubble helped the collapse.

ALL UNILATERAL INVASIONS ARE BAD.

Especially during tax cuts.  That combination destroys the economy.

 

 

Clinton on the sax: it starts at 1:30: