Kasz216 said:
You had that same arguement with Bod... who disproved your hyptothesis with actual facts and data. Where do you think I pulled the link from? "Interestingly, the Heavy Gamer segment is a lot younger than one might think too. "What always seems to surprise people, especially those that talk about the 18-34 year-old 'core gamer,' is that a majority of the heavy gamer segment is kids ages 6-17! This is true also for the 'Avid Console' gamer segment. Alternatively, the Avid PC gamer segment is older, with just over 40% represented by 18-34 year-olds," Anita Frazier, NPD industry analyst explained to GameDaily BIZ. " So no. In fact it's quite the opposite. Kinda shocked you didn't learn from your previous mistake. |
Sorry for not remembering what was said in a thread that is now several months old.
And is it really that shocking that the console that greatly appeals to the "heavy gamer" (6-17 years old) is also the one that sells by far the most? I agree that a lot of PS360 owners are still children, I've seen it first hand. But the console that sells the most by a good amount is going to end up appealing to what you describe as the heavy gamer. Hell, that's not to say that the PS360 aren't also in affluent households, but it's a lesser amount than the Wii. If that link alone was supposed to disprove my argument, it's a bit early to be so condescending.







