Dogs Rule said:
I'll help you out, PS360. Here is what h says about rape: "I don’t believe that we need to argue here for a ban on abortions in the first 3 cases. In other words, while I think I can defend So this morally superior author believes that even rape babies shouldn't be aborted, but he is willing to compromise on rape, incest and in case birth would put the life of the mother at risk. If he belives to abortion is murder, then how can he moraly compromise?
These are the "first 3 cases" he references: "Before we start discussing abortion, I want to defuse 4 of the Pro-Choice issues. These issues are:
|
so the articles author is a hippocrite







