| RCTjunkie said: @ PS360 Of course it's human before it's born. It has a working heart, and a working brain. And you should at least skim the article if you're talking about rape or accidental pregnencies |
I'll help you out, PS360. Here is what h says about rape:
"I don’t believe that we need to argue here for a ban on abortions in the first 3 cases. In other words, while I think I can defend
a ban on abortion for the Rape and Incest, I am content to grant those exceptions to you especially since they are only 1% of
the 1.3M abortions done a year. Why do I say that? Because I believe the Rape and Incest are emotional issues and if we can
save the 1.28M lives that will be a good start."
So this morally superior author believes that even rape babies shouldn't be aborted, but he is willing to compromise on rape, incest and in case birth would put the life of the mother at risk. If he belives to abortion is murder, then how can he moraly compromise?
These are the "first 3 cases" he references:
"Before we start discussing abortion, I want to defuse 4 of the Pro-Choice issues. These issues are:
1. Rape
2. Incest
3. Life of Mother
4. Contraception"
