Grey Acumen said:
basically, Sri Lumpa is attempting to assert God existence as being subjected to the universe, while I'm asserting the universe's existence being subjected to God. We're both doing this through a series of philosophical and theoretical proofs and then pointing out weaknesses in each other's proofs.
|
Not quite, while I accept that god would not be subject of the physical universe as he would have created it I see no reason for it to mean that 1) he would not be subject to the universe of logic (but feel free to believe in an illogical god) and 2) there is no medium that god didn't create which means that any medium god's existence manifests itself in would have its laws bearing upon god; laws that would need explaining just ours do, except we can't do so as we can't experience them (or with them).
"I do not suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it"
