By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soulreaver said:
twesterm said:

Actually, 300 was one of the movies I got to compare (it was one of the ones I replaced so I had both versions for a day or so) and I couldn't really tell a difference.

 


There's definitely a difference, even if you don't see it.

 

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/300.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/3003.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/3004.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/3009.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30010.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30011.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30012.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30015.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30016.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30017.html

http://www.zonadvd.com/imagenes/articulos/compa_300/30018.html

 

 

 

That's by far the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

Thank you for all the advice people, you've answered my question wonderfully but those links are idiotic.  If my DVD's looked like that even when not upscaled I would have never asked those questions.  I don't know what kind of TV and player they took those pictures on but my DVD's do not look like that.

That just seems like people trying to make you convert to HD.