TheRealMafoo said:
Everyone knows this. But the CELL+RSX is faster graphically then the XENON+XENOS.
|
Shhh, they dont want to admit that the RSX gives some of its operations to the CELL and is therefore technically quicker. Thats crazy talk to them.
On the topic, and at the guy that asked why they would do this, they didnt have to do anything besides use non-compressed textures. They already had them from the 360 version, but I would assume they had to be compressed for the DVD9, now they just use the Uncompressed versions.
And Gerbx, I would be suprised if this version gets anything lower than what the 360 version got. Especially since it has added modes.
I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.
This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:
"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"
"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"
"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"
