soccerdrew17 said:
even as a joke, posting that article is extremely trolly. the ps3 could use up to 380 watts, while the 360 was 160-200 (dont remember). the reason i say could is because that is what the power supply allows, not what the system actually can use. this actually would make the ps3 more eco friendly. it allows the system not to kill itself when it is near maximum load. the 360 has had many faulty systems because of the power supply being near max load while playing games. the ps3 never came any where close to max load and thus removed one potential source of wasted electronics. and that $40 year round is while always on at the extremely deceitful 380 watts.
|
The link is a reference to power consumption. Your post has no relevance to what I said. My point is the less watts you use, the less you pay for power. Now what's yours? Attack anyone who posts a link that has something bad to say about PS3?
Nevertheless 360 still uses less power. Now the power bill for the 360 might be more, because people might have their 360s on for more than 3 hours a day, which is highly likely. I mean most Blu-ray movies don't last longer than 3 hours. Therefore the 360 can demand up to $100 year with the power bill. haha
