By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Grey Acumen said:
Pro Choice, as in, if the woman doesn't want to have a kid, she can choose to not have sex and if she does, she sleeps with a guy who is willing to take the precautions of using whatever contraceptives are available, as well as choosing to use them herself.

I'm also Pro Medically Essential Choice, as in, if the woman is in actual PHYSICAL danger DIRECTLY from the pregnancy, she can choose to save her own life. This does not include inconvenience or financial or social danger.

I'm also Pro Trauma Recovery Choice, as in, if the woman was actually raped, she can choose not to carry the child of her rapist.

I am not however, Pro "I'd rather kill another human life that's never done anything wrong, than have to take responsibility for my own mistakes, when all I had to do was something as simple as using a basic contraceptive or JUST NOT HAVE SEX"

So basically, I'm Pro Life. All these people talking about "it's the woman's body, she should have the right to choose" Are full of shit. If a pregnant woman is killed, it's considered a double homicide. the pregnant woman never gets asked if she feels that the baby's life should count or not, it's just simply considered double murder. It wouldn't matter who the murderer was, it would still be murder.
The baby is alive, hence it is a life, hence killing it is murder. It doesn't matter who the murderer is, so that includes the woman who is pregnant with it. There's just no logical way you can say that one thing is wrong, but then the exact same thing is okay.

LMAO, this is by far the funniest response I have ever heard. We live in an age where no one accepts individual responsibility for themselves and their actions. This, sir, is in fact hate speech. How dare you suggest that a women be responsible for her actions, thats not liberal.

 



_____________________________________________________

Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com