eab on 21 July 2007
| IllegalPaladin said: What is up with people using older games as an example of the gameplay over graphics theory? It doesn't even apply to today because those games were what the graphics were at that time period. Take Half-Life for example, the graphics are terrible by today's standards, but that's how games looked at the time. Heck, didn't Half-Life have some of the best graphics at the time, hence the 5-10 minute long train ride that functioned as a tech demo? |
You don't get it do you. Take a crappy game from 2007 that you havent played yet, and take a good game from 1992 that you havent played yet. You would probably enjoy the older game better.
You can't compare a game you played 3 years ago to a game you havent played, obviously the game you havent played yet wins. I mean take someone who has never played a videogame before and let them play through Chrono Trigger, GTA 3, Goldeneye, Super Mario Sunshine, and Tetris. Sunshine has the best graphics by far, therefore it will be by far the most enjoyable game for them?
Clearly you don't own a handheld. Some of the best games I have ever played were 2D, and I'll take Goldeneye over Killzone 1 anyday.
