| NJ5 said: According to Carmack in this video, Sony will not allow 3rd parties to release late ports of 360 games unless they improve the game in some way. While I understand the reason, this surprised me a lot. It's interesting in a number of ways - the gamer's perspective, the business perspective, and, most of all, it showed me that Sony isn't as friendly to developers as I thought; I thought they were the most developer-friendly of the three, but I'm starting to doubt that.
|
Good for them, they got tired of thier system being treated as the "oh yeah, and lets see if we can make it work on that" and told them no more crap, as a mater of fact, you had better make it different in some way. The first is obviously Bioshock for this new policy, I cant think of any other ports that have had differences between the two, but I only really pay attention to games that interest me.
I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.
This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:
"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"
"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"
"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"
