By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jackson50 on 01 August 2008
Edit Thread
LongLiveTheBeatles said:
Jackson50 said:
LongLiveTheBeatles said:
Jackson50 said:
I have both a PS3 and an Xbox, but I will gladly pay the $50 for what I deem is a superior service.

 

Try not to start your argument that way. It's just a way of justifying a biased comment.

 

 Sir, you are simply incorrect. It is not a way for me to justify a biased comment. It is a way for me to signify that I have used both services, and that I subsequently prefer Xbox Live to PSN.

 

You prove you have used both services by indirectly saying it in your posts while being objective. You don't just tell people. If you make statements as highly debatable as the one you just made then at least support it with an answer to why. That's my major gripe the "I have both" argument. People then don't support an answer as to why because they think their opinion solidifies when they only seem objective.

So the only way to prove that I have used both services is by indirectly saying I have whilst also being disinterested? That sounds stupid and I am not sure what the hell it even means. Also, "I have both" is not an argument, but a qualifying statement. Not that you make much sense, but I will support why I believe Xbox Live is superior and worth the money I pay for it. I get a comprehensive, integrated online experience. I get a myriad of ways to communicate with my friends and the friends of my friends. I also get to play fun games (sometimes) developed by small, independent studios that I would not get to experience someplace else. My friends and I have spent many hours playing games like Carcassonne (which I got for free) and Undertow (which I also got for free). I cannot say those things about PSN, and that is why I gladly pay $50 for what I deem is a superior service.