| johnsobas said: 3rd party developers would rather develop for Wii, and the reason why is very simple (we're not talking about userbase size or demographics here). They would rather develop for Wii because it is easier and cheaper to develop for. The lower the cost to make it, the lower the risk for developers. Developers don't care about making great graphics, they want to make money. The only problem there could be for developers is getting used to developing for the wiimote. |
This must be the reason that GTAIV is on the Wii, oh wait... snap....
Please stop confusing devs and publishers. A dev is more like an artist, they want to make whatever they want to make, and they will choose the hardware that caters to their desires. While a publisher will "generally" make fund whatever dev project they believe will make money. There will be plenty of devs who will want to work with the newest tech as well as many that want to work with a new type of gameplay.
Devs don't care about great graphics? Are you stoopid or something? I think you still must mean publishers, but that's not true either. The Crysis devs don't care? What about Naughty Dog? Factor Five? Ninja Theory? Kojima? Sony and Microsoft certainly don't care.
Also, without the Wii there was going to be a video game draught? What the f&ck does the Wii have for it right now? It certainly will have some great titles coming out, but right now the selection is shittier than the choices on the PS3. Wii Sports, I don't think so. Zelda, yes, Super Paper Mario, yes, RE4(even if it's a remake), yes, maybe even PoP, but that's a stretch, but most of the games would not have appealed to many people that want what is available on the PS3/360. Hell, your just ignoring the fact that the PS2 is sustaining MANY gamers appetites still and will still be doing so for about 1 more year.
EDIT: Bullshit about that HD comment. HD is better than real life. =p
