MrBubbles said:
Sri Lumpa said:
MrBubbles said: im speaking from a moral perspective, not a legal one. |
The problem is you only consider the alive/dead angle in your moral choice, not the suffering/not suffering part.
If someone is suffering a horrible pain due to a terminal illness and wants to shorten this horrible suffering via euthanasia how can you consider willfully torturing them by keeping them forcefully alive to be moral?
|
i would harldy be responsible for someones suffering just because i wouldnt murder them.
|
If you force someone to suffer by refusing them the humane alternative when they want it you become responsible for the ongoing suffering even though you were not the original cause.