Kasz216 said:
Yeah... that's a problem. The News Media shouldn't be a buisness. Cause it leads to sensationalism and bad press... which influences people. It's basically untargeted propaganda. The News really probably should be run non profit. |
I don’t think the problem is profit. Liquidity makes good/better reporting possible by making the purchase of technology and travel possible. The problem is the system. Editors single handedly decide the spin and or story's tone for newspaper sections and news room and this leads to marked bias. Look at NYT and WSJ. Both can write the same story but anybody with half a brain could predict the spin.
My question about this thread is simple (we could probably start another thread about it completely):
Now that we have 16 years and 2 administrations of experience on this terrorist problem, which do you prefer?
Clinton - Police Policy - which had no teeth and resulted in at least 1 terrorist attack on America every 12-18 months of his 2 terms. Most of which were executed by Islamic radicals and several on American soil or property.
Bush - Military Policy - After 1 terrorist attack he immediately took military action on two fronts. The results were a complete loss of respect for America by the international community but no further terrorist attack on American soil.
_____________________________________________________
Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com







