bouzane said:
HappySqurriel said:
bouzane said: @Kenology
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I'm sickened by the fact that Nintendo stopped making new core games after Pikmen, Metroid Prime and Advance Wars hit the market. Now their game development seems to be entirely casual gaming or sequels to core games. My point is that there are no new core games and I don't understand how core gamers can be satisfied by that. How do I need to know more than everybody else to make more than baseless assumptions? I'm hardly the only person who thinks that Nintendo's core offerings for the rest of this console generation will be little more than sequels. |
Name 10 casual games Nintendo is currently developing? If they've abandoned the core market to focus on Casual games this should be an easy task for you
|
Games being developed by Nintendo:
Wii Sports Resort Casual Kirby Sequel Project H.A.M.M.E.R. Punch-Out!! Wii Sequel Pikmin 3 Sequel The Legend of Zelda Sequel Super Mario Platformer Sequel Densetsu no Stafy Taiketsu! Sequel Kirby Super Star Ultra Remake Pokémon Platinum Sequel Fire Emblem: Shin Ankoku... Sequel Rhythm Heaven Sequel Wander Donkey
|
So why is it bad when Nintendo averages 3.5 years between its games, and a good thing when Take-Two averages (roughly) 1 year between Grand Theft Auto games? Why is it bad that Nintendo is producing a sequel to Punch Out after it hasn't had a game in 15 years (same question about a Kirby Platformer)? What game is Rhythm Heave a sequel of?(same question of Densetsu no Stafy Taiketsu! which translates to "Legendary Stafy Confrontation! Dire Pirate Squad")?
How is Nintendo abandoning the Core gamer if Fire Emblem is seeing another sequel? (Fire Emblem being a core game of limited appeal would be one of the first games they would drop)