Kenology said:
Now you're changing up your argument. In the first post that I responded to, your argument was 1). "Nintendo is only making sequels and casual games", now you're switchin' it up and saying 2). "Nintendo hasn't made any new core franchises after Pikmin, BW, and Prime and their core offerings will only be sequels to their existing franchises". Which one is it!? And I'll even bite on your second (entirely new) argument... Why is it bad that Nintendo's core offerings won't be more than sequels? I don't see this same criticism levied at Sony for Resistence 2, Killzone 2, or God of War III... why not?
|
Wow, they both mean the same thing. Both statements mean that Nintendo makes only sequels and casual games IE. no new core franchises. That should not have been difficult to understand. I do not criticize Sony because they often make new core games (games that are neither sequels or casual) like Patapon, Loco Roco and Echocrome which is something I'd like to see Nintendo resume someday. I am not as impressed by sequels like God of War 3 and Resistance 2 as I am with new titles like LittleBigPlanet and at no point did I say that I am.







