Red Alert!!! - PS3 'very exotic and tough to develop for'

[ocnkng]

epinefridis said:

ocnkng said:

disolitude said:

docholliday said:
Honestly every topic i've seen this guy make has been sometype of stab at sony, I think he spends more time on sony forums making these type of posts than he does on MS lol.

 

And you've been here for 42 posts so you have the right to make claims like these...give me a break. 

 

You think there are separate rights that a user has based upon how many number of posts he/she has made?

Is this the way this site works..I'll be curious to know.

And are you the one who is laying out this set of laws?

I don't think that was disolitude's point. I'm a low poster myself, and yeah, I'had been following the site long before I sign up, BUT, I 'm still careful and aware of who I'm gonna bash and attack. The number of the posts is the most objective yet superficial way for someone to picture how well a user knows the site and its users. There are users who piss me off ALL the time, but I respect the fact that they spend hours and hours more in this site, and the mods tolerate them. So, what exactly is my authority so I can judge them? And furthermore, when their comments or threads have a point and are rational like gebx's. I mean, come on, he states the obvious!

 

To the console RTS haters. Come on guys... You never tried it, did you? C&C3 and Kanes Wrath are almost masterpieces in their field and the 360 versions, are what a RTS lover with a crappy PC would have dreamed of...

 

Thanks for responding intelligently to the post. I don't agree with you though. This was not about gauging how well a user knows the site or the content of it. It was about discounting someone's opinion based upon the number of posts he/she had made. If you disagree with someone you should spell out your argument and not try to win your point using some unrelated parameter.