FJ-Warez said:
Jordahn said:
Again, it doesn't matter who's reporting the facts as long as it's fact. If you want to "LOL" at "On a decent 720p TV Soul Calibur IV is one of the best looking games on the PS3, and for once better looking than the 360 version" because this is a PlayStation site, you have to "LOL" at two points 1) the PS3 version of SCIV is better looking than the 360 version and 2) the same source reported that there have been better looking 360 version games as well. What's where the cherry-picking comes from. Which is incorrect/bias? the claim that the PS3 version is visually better or the claim that ther have been better loking 360 games, both points from the exact same source? See??? But we'll just have to agree to disagree. :)
|
It matter, if we have more reports of the game been better on the PS3 great, but you choosed to post one magazine who clearly supports the console which btw they choosed as the best looking of both... they can admit that in the past the 360 version looked better, but that doesn´t made their last statment true...
|
I know for a FACT that there have been BOTH better looking PS3 AND 360 games. So with that unbiased reasoning, Play's claim sounds valid. But again, we just have to agree to disagree.
