Red Alert!!! - PS3 'very exotic and tough to develop for'

[Jordahn]

FJ-Warez said:

Jordahn said:

FJ-Warez said:

Jordahn said:

Fact is fact.  Even your most diehard fanboy of any console can be correct as long as facts are being reported.  Nothing hard to understand here.

 

Well, lets go back to your own words...

"Jordahn said:
This news goes to show that those who have a decent handle on PS3 development have been able to develop visually higher quality games (such as the recent Soul Calibur IV) than it's multi-platform counterpart. And being and "exotic" system to develop for implies the potential of the console itself for the long run. Maybe the "10 year" lifespan of the PS3 might have more validity."

Then:

"Jordahn said:

Exotic (adjective) = alien, alluring, different, elaborate, enticing, fantastic, foreign, kinky, mysterious, outlandish, romatic, strange, striking, unusual."

 

Where, in the definition of exotic, implies that the subject in case hide a mysterious, romantic, fantastic potential???

Nowhere, still you love to think that, for some reason, the PS3 is showing off its potential give to some devs a hard time...

How could the console be used at full if the devs are not willing to work with it because is "exotic"??

 

First of all, I NEVER said that "the console be used at full" so those were NOT my words  And I say "implies" because "exotic" doesn't always mean better because I NEVERsay that either.  I prefer eating sushi over a microwaveable dinner.  I think that sushi is more exotic and better than a microwaveable dinner.  And we have seen that there have been better looking multi-platform games on the PS3 while it has been more constantly reported that developing for the PS3 has been more difficult in the past.  So it's possible that as the developers get more and more of a better handle on the development, we might get some better looking games as proven by past and presnt games such as Soul Calibur IV.  Please don't take what I said out of context such as "console be used at full" and "devs are not willing to work with it" because most developers are working with it.

Lets me see if I get what you say...

You say that the console... well lets just quote it again: " And being and "exotic" system to develop for implies the potential of the console itself for the long run."

And you reasoning behind that is:

"And I say "implies" because "exotic" doesn't always mean better because I NEVERsay that either."

Still you quoted a PS mag to prove that PS3 features more potential than the Xbox 360... providing a better experience...

"So it's possible that as the developers get more and more of a better handle on the development, we might get some better looking games as proven by past and presnt games such as Soul Calibur IV. "

 

So, yeah I agree that the PS3 is supposed to be more powerfull, and maybe if is used carefully can provide us with a better experience than the 360, but I still don´t get why do you think that exotic implies the potential of the console... sorry but exotic only implies that the console is easy to work with because is a not-so-common system, and doesn´t follow very ortodox methods...

Yeah, sorry I can´t get the idea behind "exotic" implying "potential"...

 

 

Again, it doesn't matter who's reporting the facts as long as it's fact.  If you want to "LOL" at "On a decent 720p TV Soul Calibur IV is one of the best looking games on the PS3, and for once better looking than the 360 version" because this is a PlayStation site, you have to "LOL" at two points 1) the PS3 version of SCIV is better looking than the 360 version and 2) the same source reported that there have been better looking 360 version games as well.  What's where the cherry-picking comes from.  Which is incorrect/bias?  the claim that the PS3 version is visually better or the claim that ther have been better loking 360 games, both points from the exact same source?  See???  But we'll just have to agree to disagree.  :)