NJ5 said:
It seems to me that the reason UK and France talk more about it is that USA chose to not participate in the diplomatic efforts, until recently that is. USA is as interested in Iran's nuclear program, or more so than France and UK. Regarding Iran, USA's administration had a very strange position until lately. They were saying "we'll only enter negotiations if Iran agrees to stop its nuclear program". That doesn't make any sense, what's the point of having negotiations after the other party has already agreed on kneeling down?? The fact that the USA suddenly sent a diplomat to Switzerland to participate in the discussions only tells me one thing - they want to look like they're exhausting diplomatic options, in order to better justify an impending attack / supporting Israel's attack.
|
It's simple, they stop for the time being then we have goof faith negotiation efforts. Rather then just negotiations as they stall for time... which is what Iran has basically been doing. Nobody has even talked about attacking Iran for a long time in the US It's not something they'd just spring on it's people. They likely expect Europe or Israel to handle the matter... or both. Then just tag along if things go bad. I don't see the US making any actual move until Obama is president. They really don't want to start another war right before the election.








