By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
FishyJoe said:
I don't really see IBM or whoever spending that kind of money to build a low power chip that can compete with Intel. Plus it makes no sense to build a laptop that can't run most of the software in the world.

What? the chip would be Cell. it will be a PS3 internally.

"can't run most of the software"... do you mean Linux? If you mean the PS3 utilizing Linux sub-optimally, the concern folds into the one raised by sc94597, and I think the PS3's use of Linux can drastically be improved upon with a little effort. The effort would be worth it for this product.

The Eee and other sub-portable machines are weak and use linux. They sell like wildfire, too. Their bonus is their size, while the PS3portable will be able to play PS3 games, give you access to Home, play Blu-Ray discs, etc.

Anyway.

 


Just curious... what expierence do you actually have when it comes to building computers/laptops.

Cause nothing you've said really makes any sense to me.

Besides which... why would you want to handicap the PS3 with a tiny screen. Kind of wastes the HD graphics.

 

I think it would have a HD output.. actually someone already built this.

 

 



Check out my game about moles ^