RolStoppable said:
Whom should I believe now? The guy whose only SRPG was FFT or the guy who played pretty much every SRPG that came to America? |
I actually missed a lot of PS1 era RPGS.
The thing about FFTA is that it has a lot of sidequests which take the place of level grinding. I can see how someone would think that FFTA would be easier if they completed most of the sidequests before they went on.
Overall though it'll be a lot harder to progress in FFTA with minimal time spent on side stuff. FFT just seems harder because everything feels like it takes forever if you decide to level up your guys outside of the main story at all.
Now an actual hard SRPG. That's either Hoshigami Runing Blu Earth or a Fire Emblem.
Hoshigami you can level grind... so it's easier... in theory. But you have to level grind after like every battle... because your always ountnumbered and facing higher level opponents.
Once you get a couple of the killer classes FFT it's cake cause the game isn't balanced well.
