mesoteto on 25 July 2008
| BMaker11 said: The commentors at Kotaku really nailed it on this one. This is just a flamebait interview. One guy said (On Kotaku): "No matter what answer Kaz gave, this review would've been flame-bait. If he mentioned Gears, people would take it as Kaz saying the PS3 can't survive without Gears. It might also piss off Sony's internal developers, as Kaz would be downplaying their importance. There's literally no answer Kaz would be able to give that wouldn't result in people getting mad. This was the safest answer. " And think about it. The only reason this question arised is because Sony lost exclusives. But that's they HAD exclusives to lose. WTF from 3rd parties does M$ have exclusively? It'd be pointless if Kaz mentioned a first party game, cause that would never happen, and would be the equivalent of Aaron Greenberg (douche) saying that he wanted Killzone 2.......neither of those situation would ever happen, so why say that you want them? In the end, this is all just smart PR, and not "Why do only Sony reps make dumb comments?" |
thats just stupid...i am sorry but no matter what there are games on another macine that will be nice to have, even if its just taking away from teh comp..
halo
mass effect series
fable
gears
those other square rpgs that will be exclusive (not sure the names they were mentioned at e3)
too humane (i think its exclusive)
i mean spin it like you want but dont play dumb
