superchunk said:
So, even though Israel is has done as much if not arguably more wrong in this entire conflict that stems from the early 1900's, only the Arabs should be penalized since they have less weaponary. Yep, that sounds justified. In that case can we make Iraq the 51st state so we can have a lot of nearly free oil?
|
Right or wrong, Israel was given to the Jews. It can't be undone. They fight to defend themselves. Most of the Arab countries have directly or indirectly attacked Israel. Even after the Six Days War and the Yom Kippur war the Arab nations (or Muslim nations since they are not all Arabs) sponsored terrorist attacks by the Palestinians. People like Arafat were not interested in taking steps to create any sort of Palestinian state or even creating a climate where Palestinians could have even taken part in the Israeli democracy. They wanted to kill Israelies in the insane hope that they could bus bomb Israel into just disolving. The Palestinians got fucked, but the Arab nations never really liked them, it just turns out that they hated Israel more than the Palestinians. So they give the Palestinians some money but they certianly didn't want any of the refugees. Most of the Middle-Eastern nations detest each other. There isn't one big great happy Muslim fellowship going on.
As for the policy towards the Middle-East, the west and east just want to bleed the whole area dry of oil until no one has to care what goes on there anymore. I agree with this policy. Some Middle-Eastern countries have figured out they need to invest in the future, some haven't. I figure that once the oil isn't a point of contention anymore, the whole area will become a lot more polite.
I give that post a 9.3.
Thank god for the disable signatures option.







