The fanboys come out in droves when these things happen (and yes, I'm referring to both 360 and PS3 fanboys). Why? because of insecurity. Both the 360 and PS3 have had their share of better multi-platform games regardless of how slight the difference might be. Why can't you guys just put such trivial issues aside and enjoy a game and its console for what it really is? And who cares how powerful a console is according to processing numbers is as long as the end results are pleasing in the real world? I remember when NCAA 08 ran better on the 360 than the PS3, but now, both versions of NCAA 09 are practically identical according to the reviews. And this is becoming a more common trend. I'm just gald that the game itself was better than its last year counterpart. So what's more important here, theoretical processing power or the end results? If nothing else, third party developers are still backing the PS3. The 360 had a year head start, and it has a larger userbase over the PS3. But yet for some reason, these developers are still backing the PS3. There's got to be a good reason admist all the worst case scenario of "doom and gloom" for the PS3. You'd think that if the PS3 were as "bad" as some would claim, third party development would and could have easily dumped and PS3 altogether to save R&D and just concentrate entirely on the 360 for HD games. Come up with any reason, with any opinion. But what I state is reality, people whatever the reason. PS3 fanboys, there is nothing truely significant to prove that the PS3 is significantly more powerful than the 360 at the moment. Xbox 360 fanboys, don't let the PS3 be a thorn in your sides because third parties have more than enough reason to keep pushing the system for reasons either we don't know or it's because you choose to ignore.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
