Article: "The problem with Sony".....what do you make of it?

[Pristine20]

disolitude said:

Pristine20 said:

 

With your reasons for the ps3 failing to offer, you do realize that those problems are mostly a result of launching a year later in NA and 16 months late in EU right? It sounds like you're contradicting yourself. No way, the ps3 would have ever sat in discount bins like Hd-DVD movies because there are lots of people like me who are brand-loyal. I could make the claim that 10 mil out of the current 14 mil ps3'swere sold on brand loyalty. Especially in EU where the 360 is waaay cheaper, ps3 released 16 months late and has already caught up to the 360!

On topic, I have to agree with the analyst on the brand-loyalty sales because at the time of the ps3's launch, most people didn't really want to upgrade to a new HD format so you can't really say blu-ray sold many consoles. Even though there was a vastly superior line-up for a gamer on 360, people (like me) chose the ps3 because:

1. The name "playstation" is synonymous with gaming in my household not nintendo surprisingly

2. I became a true gamer with the advent of the ps1 and still play games from that generation. I needed 1 machine to play them all and offer me the potential of new experiences. I wasn't sold based on home or any online service because I've always been a jrpg fan first and never really played much of any other genre till this gen. COD4 is the first FPS I ever purchased and the first game I ever played online and for me, the PSN worked fine.

However, I have to agree with the analyst that sony went too far with the ps3 hardware tech. It was Krazy Ken's disease. He seemed so engulfed in releasing hardware more powerful than microsoft's that he lost all focus on what the made the empire he had built as great as it was. Perhaps this was because people kept showing how the xbox was more powerful than ps2. M$ sold a whole buch of xbox's just by proving that alone. As an engineer, it looks like his ego was at stake having products out there that were more powerful than his invention. Thus came the lust for tech prowress that is the ps3.

Personally, I think Kutaragi singlehandedy invigorated gaming and developed the greatest empire ever (hint: its called "playstation"). However, he also singlehandedly took it down by going crazy with the R&D without even bothering to report to his bosses.  Is it possible that he did this on purpose because they didn't make him CEO even when the PS brand was responsible for the vast majority of sony's profits back then? We will never know.

For me, I appreciate what Ken has done even though he failed on his 3rd attempt because he brought me the best games and entertainment I've had my entire life just like I still consider Zidane my favorite player ever despite his gaffe at the world cup. For this reason, I'll support PS till it ceases to exist or till I cease to enjoy gaming...whichever comes first!

 

I can't help but respect your approach to gaming here but also at the same time its one of the most rediculous things I've ever heard. I'm cool with brand loyalty as long as that brand offers the best experience for me. If that is no longer the case, the brand means nothing.

Sony microsoft and nintendo are all faceless corporations that employ 1000s of people. While Ken Kutaragi may decide on the business strategy for the playstation brand name...he doesn't have the slightest clue how the Cell works, how bluray works or how PS3 works.

So by respecting him, you are basically respecting sony price cuts, sony press releases and sony marketting strategies rather than sony products, sony games etc...

To appreciate people that made your precious Ps1, PS2 and PS3 and the games you love you have to respect the faceles engeneers and game designers that worked on it...hence why brand loyalty doesn't make any sense. Most of the people responsible for PS1, PS2 PS3 may not even be working at sony anymore...but toshiba or wherever instead. Maybe even microsoft...lol.

I really don't want to go full moon on this one but as the CEO of a division, you're responsible for what comes out of it. If he doesn't know how blu-ray works or anything about the cell's architecture, that only puts more blame on his head. My sole reason for respecting him is for his original invention the "playstation" because it was generally his idea not sony as a whole or anyone else there for that matter. I was always just a casual gamer who just stopped by my friend's house to play Killer Instinct. His invention has provided countless hours of entertainment for me and even a game as old as Legend of Dragoon rivals MGS4 with the amount of enjoyment I'm getting from playing it. Sure, many have moved on from the old generations and I may sound ridiculous but I'm not done yet and probably never will be lol.