By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NNN2004 said:
darklich13 said:
NNN2004 said:
DMeisterJ said:
starcraft said:
DMeisterJ said:
starcraft said:
IT will never end Gebx.

There will never be more than a marginal difference in graphical capabilities between the PS3 and Xbox 360.

Guess that you've never heard of this game called "Killzone 2" huh?

The one that looks no better than Gears of War 2 in any meaningful way but has had over double the development time?

That one?

Joking?

I hope you seriously don't think Gears 2 > Killzone 2 graphically.

If so, we have nothing more to discuss in this thread.

until now Killzone 2 graphics is only a myth

 

Killzone 2 looks worse and worse every year.  The target CG gameplay they showed at E3 2 years ago is a far cry from what was shown this year.  Killzone was a poor mans Halo and from the looks of it Killzone 2 will be just the same.  IMO Gears 2 is just as impressive in the graphics dept too.

 

this is the trick that sony always do .. ( put a CG movie to attract people then give them the s... ) they do the same trick this E3 with GOW 3 & MAG .. now its pass 4 years and we still see the same trailer & stage of Killzone 2 .... the trailer is showed before the relese of gears 1 .. and now we will get the second gears & Killzone 2 still not released ?? ..... ( this is a truth cannot be changed with a fan talk ).

 

1. What ? Your kiddin' i get it.. :) With the amount of chaos it does look and appear better in every meaningful way possible.

2. Wot O.o.. oh a joke ..or what ?

3. Wtf ?.. man you can't possibly be serious ? You do know that people are in pretty much an agreement that graphics look better now than last year right ?

4. If the target render was shown at e3 2005 and we currently are in e3 2008. How many years does that make ?

Also we have seen atleast two levels of killzone 2. And everytime it's different places in those levels.

 



Check out my game about moles ^