whatever said:
This whole thread, along with Peter Moore are pretty f'ing stupid. I think that's the point of what mitsuhide is saying. If I can now get a 60GB PS3 for $500, when it used to be $600, that's a price cut. Sorry MS bozo's. If you can say, hey, but the console is still only available at $500 and $600, then what others are saying, is with the elite, the 360 is now either $300, $400, or $480 instead of just $300 or $400. So by this threads and Moore's line of reasoning, with is totally absurd, MS raised the price of the 360 "console" when the elite came out.
|
Responding to your first paragraph, yes for the 60GB model the price is lower, so in that regard it is a price cut. Add in the fact that they are not going to ship/make any more and you have what is called a clearance sale. A clearance sale is just a price cut with the goal of getting rid of stock. But if you want to say "The PS3 got a price cut." then when the 60GB models are all gone you need to also say "The PS3 got a price increase!".
Responding to your second paragraph, your post betrays you and tells everyone in this thread that you have failed to read the thread and just posted as a knee-jerk reaction. Or if you did read it, then you have low reading comprehension. Nobody is claiming that introducing a higher priced model somehow "negates" a price cut. What people have said is that the lowest price point that the PS3 has sold at has not changed.