By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
your mother on 16 July 2007
Edit Thread
Bodhesatva said:
your mother said:
KBG29 said:
...

I can understand your views on the PS3, but in all honesty, many of the unique selling points you mention may be moot for a PC gamer:

The PS3 is the only system to deliver truly next generation gameplay, alongside breathtaking CG quality graphics.
The PC's had that for years.

With the widest viriety of genres across any console the PS3 has something for everyone.
The PC blows all three consoles' lineup of titles, combined, out of the water.

Have kids at home that want to play games, their is no place with more games for kids than the PS3.
Again, the PC is the console to get if you are talking about kids, especially toddlers. The PC is the only platform that has a wide selection of EC (Early Childhood) titles to choose from.

The system also plays Blu Ray movies which are spectacular if you have an HDTV.
This point is very true, as even though I can buy a Blu-ray player/burner for a PC, the overall experience isn't as seamless. The cheapest Blu-ray for PCs still costs around 450 clams; having said that, it does burn Blu-rays as well, which the PS3 doesn't handle. I'm sure internal Blu-ray players will be much cheaper than that.

Apart from that, though, many of the USPs for the PS3 are simply irrelevant:

The Playstation 3 is the only console built to be future proof and for that reason it is the only console ready for Internet 2 with a 1Gbit ethernet port.
You know, when I bought my new PC recently, I chose an ASUS mainboard and they didn't even have options without Gigabit - my mainboard comes with two gigabits built-in, with wireless AP built-in as well.

Most of the other points you mentioned aren't even ready yet, so I still think those points about the PSN delivering downloadable movies is irrelevant, as it doesn't exist yet. You can, however, start downloading games and movies on a PC. Xbox Live also offers HD movie and TV downloads right now.

Edit: Not dissing the PS3 - just want to put things into perspective. The OP said he comes from a PC world and is looking for a completely different experience, and honestly, the points you mention simply aren't very compelling from a PC gamer's perspective.


While I may agree, Your Mother, let's not get in to system criticisms here. That would quickly devolve into flame wars, I suspect.

Instead, let's all pitch our systems and leave everyone else to pitch theirs. If you feel that this is a downside of the PS3, point out the upside of the Wii instead. For example, pitch the Wii by saying: "It's very unlike the PC experience, so if you're looking for something completely new and distinct, pick the Wii!"

I think that would be a fair pitch.


I don't think it's invalid criticism. I think that the OP wanted a "completely different experience", and I honestly fail to see how the 360 or PS3 can deliver on that account.

I also did mention that the OP should not expect anything remotely decent compared to the PC's graphics if he plans to get a Wii. That is what I would consider a pretty negative downside to the Wii, especially if the PC gamer is used to knockout graphics.

I still maintain that the Wii would be the best qualified to deliver on the "completely different experience" that the OP wants. I still maintain that both the PS3 and 360 would not deliver on those counts nearly as well as the Wii, not because the Wii is so much better in terms of gameplay compared to the other two consoles but because the PS3 and 360 are so similar to the PC but ultimately fall short.

In any case, I like all systems as long as they allow me to play games, and I believe that the OP, having mentioned MAME, isn't too caught up with graphics anyhow (MAME games look as bad compared to the Wii as Wii games look bad compared to the 360 and PS3) so the Wii should be able to deliver on that "completely different experience" - you know, like swinging the Wii remote around or shaking your booty in Warioware.