GooseGaws said:
"Faithful?" No offense, but have you actually read 300? The movie was a long way from faithful. In terms of adaptations, the Sin City movie is probably the most accurate representation of its source material. I can't imagine how a Watchmen movie could ever measure up to the amazing quality of the graphic novel. After seeing the trailer, I'm even less convinced. I'm sure I'll have to see it out of morbid curiosity, but I think we'd be better off without it. I guess if it encourages more people to read the book, that's something. |
300 was far too thin to actually make a movie out of. Sure there were many added scenes, but I felt that it all helped the film, not deter from it. When I say faithful, I don't mean basing your entire directing duties on making sure every frame of the comic is shown live on screen like in Sin City. Sin City suffered because they took the novels raw and didn't add or subtract what worked or didn't work for a movie adaptation. I don't see why they couldn't have taken some liberties. I mean Frank Miller was completely involved in it.








