facher83 said:
What's ironic here is that very few people ON THIS FORUM debate which console is more fun (actually, it doesn't happen as frequent as most, really). It's a bait post. People are used to it here. The reply given to you by allthehoneys is very legitament. Re-read the line "FFS, do you go around asking everyone you meet who says they're having fun to justify why it's fun for them and not for you?"
Prinstine20, I'm not about to claim Xbox and PS are no fun. I have both older ones (don't see the need to get the new ones). I enjoy Wii for many reasons. Asking for reasons as to why 29 million owners need to justify their high attachment rate (more games are sold for Wii than other consoles per unit). It's like complaining that the DS is too gimicky, or the games are too cutesie compared to the PSP. It's a pointless argument.
Asking everyone to redefine or justify their term of fun, or use it less attached to "Wii" (since going against the grain and claiming it's not) is grounds to get slammed, honestly. It's much easier to apprecaite a Wii if you owned a NES or SNES, or a gameboy, or even SegaG and Atari.
It's synonymous with "fun" because I've played it with an 86 year old grandma of mine, and a 3 year old cousin at the same time. Try that on a PS3. |
Problem is, I'd rather play my games alone with friends but definitely not with my grandma? I'm not asking for justification on why the wii is fun. I'm arguing that all consoles are "fun" since their owners "enjoy" playing them. Doesn't fun= enjoyment?
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler







