By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Fishie on 17 July 2008
Edit Thread
BMaker11 said:
FJ-Warez said:
shanbcn said:
FJ-Warez said:
 

Yeah, because we have seen tons of gameplay videos... lol... and is not that bad, GTA4, DMC4, CoD4, you name it, there no big gap... lol...

 

 

GTA4 area was smaller then PS2 vice city, no wonder R* come out and said MS will need better storage if they want next GTA to be on 360. The gap is there which is "HUGE", just look at KZ2.

So, are you comparing a sandbox game with a FF???

And "we" know that the gap is so huge... because we have seen tons of game like Killzone 2 on the 360...

 

 

 It's not an issue of seeing footage of KZ2 on the 360. I only brought that in because the claim was that the graphical abilities of the two are similar, but KZ2 blows away everything on the 360 (including you Mr. Gears of War). This, in part, coincides with any questions there are about the loss in quality in terms of graphics, sound, gameplay, etc, bewtween the 360 and PS3 versions of FFXIII. If the PS3 can make games that make 360 games look like meh, who's to say that FFXIII could have been in that category, but now since it's multiplat, it won't be because Sqaure wants the two versions to be equal?

Ah you seem to know what square wants, then you knew last week that they wanted to bring the game to 360.

So why didnt you tell us?

Also KZ2 doesnt make Gears2 look MWEH, it looks better yes but as someone who played the games KZ2 in no way makes Gears look bad.

Also since development of KZ2 started Epic had not even begun on Gears one, by the time KZ2 is out Epic will have released Gears1 and 2 and will be working on Gears3 and all three of the gears games combined will have cost less then one third of what KZ2 has cost so far.