By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Groucho on 17 July 2008
Edit Thread
Fanatical111 said:
Groucho said:
Squilliam said:
Groucho said:

Edited for length

If the Xbox360 is considered technically inferior then Gears 2 is in itself a technical marvel. *BOLD1*

Lol.  If making games on the PS3 is harder than the 360, then no 360 game deserves a high spot, by the same "logic".

 I won't even comment on this point, waste of time.

Valve has made some of the most successful FPS games in the history of gaming. Their sales of HL1/2/3 alone exceed 15million. They have fun down to an art form. It explains their success yaknow? *Bold2*

...on the PC.  They number amongst the 3rd party devs who are unwilling to develop on the PS3 because its "too hard".   Aw.  Not expecting much from them, even if it is spiffy on the PC.  iD used to make great games too... back when technical prowess mattered more than making... a good game.

Logically, regardless if they develop on the PS3 or not, they are one of the best FPS developers on the planet.  Fair enough your not expecting much but that really says little about you as a gamer.  They developed the game that completely changed the FPS genre.  They are the developers of one of the most complete FPS packages avaliable today.  As such, your opinion of them is completely unjustified. 

HL and HL2 ware hardly a revolution.  I will agree to disagree with you on that.  You like it, I thought it was boring.  Decent shader tech, decent physics, same old gameplay.

 

Secondly, ID still makes amazing games.  Gears of War for example will be one of the best if not the best shooter of this generation.  IMO nothing these year can touch it.  Sorry that you think that but IGN, Gamespot, 1up etc. all shake there head at you.

Um.  iD had nothing to do with Gears.  Gears of War was a great addition to the shooter genre, though... but... wasn't made by iD... so why are we talking about it again?