By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dgc1808 said:
NJ5 said:

I'd much rather get up to switch disks every 10 hours than paying 150 more euros for a PS3 instead of a 360.

 

 

XBL?? And some of us need Wifi.... not to mention reportadly Bluray is growing faster than DVD did....

 

 XBL is optional.  SE says that the 2 versions would be the same and that they are looking at ways to compress the audio as well as cutscenes etc etc. It does not sound like they are unsure how to get it to the 360 it sounds like they are just looking for ways to minimize the amount of discs. This was all said in the OP (the title is misleading) except for the 2 versions being the same which everyone now seems to think that the 360 version will look like utter crap, which it won't.

This "lawl change discs" argument is a bunch of immature nonsense. 360 owners will not give a crap about switching disks and ironically the PS3 fanboys still spew it like its the end of the world that someone would have to change a disk.

Load times? Leetgeek you made it pretty clear that you haven't played any 360 games with this statement "Because from what I understand rpgs on 360 have some of the worst load times of any type of game ever created."  So you really don't know do you? You just magically heard they were crap right? The load times are fine and to bring it up is a pathetic attempt at damage control. You've been posting a lot of nonsense threads lately so I'll just tell you what you wanna hear: MS sucks. Does that make you feel better?



Consoles Owned: Sega Genesis, NES, PS2 (RIP) N64, Xbox, Xbox 360, PS3, Wii

  

"In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is rule."

~ Friedrich Nietzsche